Today, I completed the survey “How Good Are Your
Decision-Making Skills?” While working through the survey, I did not feel like
the scenarios were too predictable. When completing some surveys, individuals
are susceptible to response bias, which means they select answers that make
them look better or feel better about themselves. I did not feel any pressure
to select the correct answers when completing this specific survey. The given
scenarios were not controversial and did not ask respondents to choose the most
morally correct answers. More to the point, I found that this survey was an
accurate depiction of my decision-making skills and tendencies.
First, according to the general score interpretation, I fell
into the “medium” or “okay” total decision-making process score. This means
that I understand the basics of decision-making, but I am not an expert. The
survey goes on to state that I earned 11 out of 20 stars for establishing a
positive decision-making environment. A positive decision-making environment is
one which creates a focus on the decision at hand and gathers the right group
for making the decision. I think my lack of leadership experience plays a role
here. I have not had much experience in leading work-groups, and for that
reason, I have a hard time being the disciplinarian and keeping the group
on-task.
Another sub-par score for me was generating potential
solutions, a category where I scored 9 out of 15 stars. I find this to be
somewhat inaccurate. I believe in my decision-making I successfully generate
potential solutions (almost too many decisions). Perhaps my inability to narrow
down potential solutions is part of the reason for a score deficit in this
category. Further, I scored around 50% for the categories: deciding and checking
the decision. Often, I find myself bogged down with too many options for a
decision, making it nearly impossible to close in on a specific, correct,
decision. I examine all the options until all are viable and each have their
own pros and cons.
Two categories that were strong for me were evaluating
alternatives and communicating and interpreting. I also find these results to
be accurate. Communication is one of my strengths as an employee and as a
leader. I think I do an exceptional job of keeping all stakeholders up-to-date
with the information they want and need. It does not surprise me that the same
is true within my decision-making. In regard to communication within
decision-making, I think I excel at ensuring that all parties are filled in and
understand my decision. I am an open-book. As for evaluating alternatives, this
is one of my strengths, but also a weakness, as aforementioned.
As I was reading some of the materials for this week, one
tip struck me specifically. Tai Lopez (as cited in Suslow, 2017), states
“sometimes good enough is perfect”. Often in my decision, I try to find the
perfect solution, which often isn’t time-efficient or even possible. Similarly,
Jeff Bezos (as cited in Mejia, 2018) urges decision-makers to categorize
decisions into reversible and irreversible decisions. When making irreversible
decisions, individuals should take more time and weigh out all the
alternatives. When making reversable decisions, it’s preferred that individuals
make decisions with about 70% of the information they desire. I think I
typically shoot for knowing 100% of the information, which slows my
decision-making down significantly.
A third option that matches or improves my decision-making
style is clear goal setting (Arsham, 2017). In my athletic career, I always had
built-in goals. However, I often neglect goal-setting in my professional life.
My goal is to do a good job. This is obviously not a clear or workable goal,
though it is very achievable. Clear, workable goals are important, I know, but
I struggle to set these goals for myself. Goals could help me make faster
decisions in the workplace.
At this stage of my career, I feel that authentic leadership
is my most effective leadership style. Authentic leadership requires clear and
effective communication. Utilizing this style means the leader is self-aware
and understands the nature of their relationship with their followers.
Communication is one of the strong-points of my decision-making and can be used
in authentic leadership too. Rather than inspiring, making critical decisions,
or having great vision, authentic leaders are more focused on working with
people. I think authentic leadership suits my personality and my
decision-making. I do not try to overstate decisions to my colleagues, I prefer
to be straightforward with them (Northouse, 2015).
Overall, through this journal, I’ve strengthened my understanding
of my own indecisiveness. Rather than succumb to the temptation of utilizing
group-decision making (and avoiding making the decision on my own), I’ve
reflected on some ways that I can improve my own strategies. This course will
continue to help me understand my avoidance of decisions and how to decrease
that avoidance.
References
Northouse, P. G. (2015). (7th
ed.) Leadership: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks:
CA: Sage Publications.